In the middle of February [2/14/12] Google posted another update to improve your ad’s quality and relevance to the searcher. The benefit of the update is the ability to more clearly display deeper “site links” links back to your site.
“We’ve talked before about how useful ad sitelinks can be. They give users more options, and deliver advertisers more clicks. On average, the clickthrough rate is 30% higher for ads with sitelinks than those without.”
“We’ve continued experimenting with new ways to make sitelinks even better. Today, we’re taking the covers off one of our strongest performing experiments. It works by incorporating text from ads in your account that are related to your sitelinks. The easiest way to understand things is with an example:
Say you’ve created sitelinks for your pizza restaurant campaign, and your ad displays sitelinks as shown here:

Now, let’s say your account also includes the following text ads:

With this enhancement, your ad could now look like this:

To be eligible, your ad with sitelinks must show above Google search results and your account must contain active ads closely related to the sitelinks in your campaign.
In testing, people reported that ads with enhanced sitelinks were more useful and relevant. And clickthrough rates were significantly higher than the same ad with traditional 2- and 3-line sitelinks.”
Related Blog Posts:
- Notes From Google: Ads Quality Improvements
this post originally appeared on the Inside AdWords Blog When searching on Google, users appreciate results that are relevant and deliver a great experience after they click. In August, we...
- Google AdWords PPC – Budget Hogs
Using Proper Pay Per Click Account Structure is important from the start date of any Google AdWords account. Organizing your Campaigns, Ad Groups, Keywords & Ads into relevant and tightly...
- Series: Google AdWords 101 – Quality Score
Everything we have been talking about in this section comes down to this: Quality Score is KEY! The higher your Quality Score, the lower your costs. So now that we...